Skip to content

An O'Raifeartaigh model and its Goldstino

A scalar direction can be flat even though its vacuum breaks supersymmetry. Does a massless fermion then require the scalar to remain massless? We will find both modes in one classical model and calculate the quantum correction that separates them.

This lesson continues the vacuum tests and the first quantum correction. We work in flat four-dimensional global N=1\mathcal N=1 supersymmetry, with all four real supercharges manifest in the usual superspace. There are three neutral chiral multiplets, no gauge group and no supergravity. The calculation concerns constant scalar backgrounds and their fluctuations.

A model whose F equations cannot all vanish

Section titled “A model whose F equations cannot all vanish”

Let X,ϕ1,ϕ2X,\phi_1,\phi_2 denote chiral superfields and, when writing the potential, their scalar components. Choose

K=XˉX+ϕˉ1ϕ1+ϕˉ2ϕ2,W=fX+h2Xϕ12+mϕ1ϕ2.K=\bar X X+\bar\phi_1\phi_1+\bar\phi_2\phi_2,\qquad W=fX+\frac h2X\phi_1^2+m\phi_1\phi_2.

The fields have engineering dimension one; ff has dimension two, mm dimension one and hh dimension zero. Take all three coefficients nonzero. Independent constant rephasings of the fields allow us to choose f,h,m>0f,h,m>0 for this calculation.

Write Wi=∂W/∂ϕiW_i=\partial W/\partial\phi_i, including XX among the fields. The canonical auxiliary equation is Fi=−Wi‾F_i=-\overline{W_i}. Here

WX=f+h2ϕ12,W1=hXϕ1+mϕ2,W2=mϕ1.W_X=f+\frac h2\phi_1^2,\qquad W_1=hX\phi_1+m\phi_2,\qquad W_2=m\phi_1.

If all auxiliaries vanished, W2=0W_2=0 would require ϕ1=0\phi_1=0, but then WX=f≠0W_X=f\ne0. There is no supersymmetric solution at a finite field value. That observation alone would not exclude an unstable stationary point or a runaway. We must inspect the potential:

V=∣f+h2ϕ12∣2+∣hXϕ1+mϕ2∣2+m2∣ϕ1∣2.V=\left|f+\frac h2\phi_1^2\right|^2 +|hX\phi_1+m\phi_2|^2+m^2|\phi_1|^2.

Define the dimensionless ratio

r=hfm2,0<r<1.r=\frac{hf}{m^2},\qquad 0<r<1.

This restriction has a physical purpose. Since Re⁡(ϕ12)≥−∣ϕ1∣2\operatorname{Re}(\phi_1^2)\ge-|\phi_1|^2,

V≥f2+(m2−hf)∣ϕ1∣2+h24∣ϕ1∣4+∣hXϕ1+mϕ2∣2.V\ge f^2+(m^2-hf)|\phi_1|^2 +\frac{h^2}{4}|\phi_1|^4+|hX\phi_1+m\phi_2|^2.

Every term after f2f^2 is nonnegative. In the stated strict inequality, equality requires

ϕ1=ϕ2=0,X arbitrary,Vtree=f2.\phi_1=\phi_2=0,\qquad X\ \text{arbitrary},\qquad V_{\rm tree}=f^2.

Thus we have found the full global classical minimum set, not just a stationary point. There is no classical direction with energy below f2f^2, even at arbitrarily large fields. Along the minimum set, FX=−fF_X=-f and the other auxiliaries vanish.

The complex coordinate XX is a pseudomodulus: a flat classical direction through nonsupersymmetric minima. Unlike a protected moduli space of supersymmetric vacua, this degeneracy can be lifted by quantum corrections. This is the canonical model of Intriligator–Seiberg, §2.5, (2.28)–(2.30).

First expand about X=ϕ1=ϕ2=0X=\phi_1=\phi_2=0. Use canonically normalized real fields, ϕ1=(a+ib)/2\phi_1=(a+ib)/\sqrt2 and ϕ2=(c+id)/2\phi_2=(c+id)/\sqrt2. The quadratic potential is

V=f2+12(m2+hf)a2+12(m2−hf)b2+12m2(c2+d2)+⋯ .V=f^2+\frac12(m^2+hf)a^2+\frac12(m^2-hf)b^2 +\frac12m^2(c^2+d^2)+\cdots.

The scalar XX supplies two additional real fields with zero tree-level mass. The fermion mass term is −12Wijψiψj+h.c.-\tfrac12W_{ij}\psi_i\psi_j+\text{h.c.}; at this point

Wij=(00000m0m0)(X,1,2).W_{ij}= \begin{pmatrix} 0&0&0\\ 0&0&m\\ 0&m&0 \end{pmatrix}_{(X,1,2)}.

Hence ψ1,ψ2\psi_1,\psi_2 form a massive pair with mass mm, while ψX\psi_X is massless. The bosonic and fermionic masses have split:

FluctuationsSquared masses at the origin
Two real components of ϕ1\phi_1m2+hf, m2−hfm^2+hf,\ m^2-hf
Two real components of ϕ2\phi_2m2, m2m^2,\ m^2
Two heavy Weyl fermionsm2, m2m^2,\ m^2
Two real components of XX and the Weyl fermion ψX\psi_X0, 00,\ 0 and 00 at tree level

The fermion ψX\psi_X is the Goldstino, the massless fermionic mode associated with spontaneous breaking of global supersymmetry. At a constant bosonic background its transformation contains

δψX=2 ϵFX=−2 fϵ.\delta\psi_X=\sqrt2\,\epsilon F_X=-\sqrt2\,f\epsilon.

Its nonzero field-independent shift identifies the broken transformation. The massless direction can also be derived from stationarity. For canonical kinetic terms,

0=∂iV=WijWj‾.0=\partial_i V=W_{ij}\overline{W_j}.

Thus a nonzero F expectation value gives a null vector of the fermion mass matrix. In this model that vector points entirely along XX.

The corresponding quantum Goldstino statement follows from the conserved supersymmetry current and its Ward identity in a regular vacuum with broken global supersymmetry. In infinite volume one formulates it using the current, rather than assuming that the broken charge creates a normalizable zero-momentum state. See Tong, §3.4.1. No such Ward identity requires the scalar partner to stay massless: the vacuum no longer organizes excitations into degenerate unbroken-supermultiplet spectra.

There is also an R symmetry with R(X)=R(ϕ2)=2R(X)=R(\phi_2)=2 and R(ϕ1)=0R(\phi_1)=0, with the coefficients held fixed. At X=0X=0 it is unbroken. The scalar flat direction there is therefore not a Goldstone boson of a broken R symmetry.

Keep the masses as functions of the background

Section titled “Keep the masses as functions of the background”

A loop can lift XX only if the particles circulating in it feel XX. Choose a point on the classical valley, ϕ1=ϕ2=0\phi_1=\phi_2=0. The R symmetry rotates its phase, so we may use a real background X=xX=x to compute a potential that depends on ∣X∣|X|.

The heavy fermion mass matrix and its squared-mass matrix are

MF(x)=(hxmm0),A(x)=MF†MF=(m2+h2x2hmxhmxm2).M_F(x)= \begin{pmatrix}hx&m\\m&0\end{pmatrix}, \qquad A(x)=M_F^\dagger M_F =\begin{pmatrix}m^2+h^2x^2&hmx\\hmx&m^2\end{pmatrix}.

Expanding the original scalar potential to quadratic order gives two real blocks. The (a,c)(a,c) block and (b,d)(b,d) block are respectively

B+(x)=A(x)+hfP,B−(x)=A(x)−hfP,P=(1000).B_+(x)=A(x)+hfP,\qquad B_-(x)=A(x)-hfP,\qquad P=\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&0\end{pmatrix}.

The term fh Re⁡ϕ12fh\,\operatorname{Re}\phi_1^2 causes the opposite shifts. These are mass-squared matrices: each BB has two real scalar eigenvalues, while AA has two Weyl-fermion mass-squared eigenvalues.

For r<1r<1, both blocks are positive at every finite real xx. For example their upper-left entries are positive and

det⁡B±=m2(m2±hf)>0.\det B_\pm=m^2(m^2\pm hf)>0.

The eigenvalues need not be written as lengthy radicals to do the loop calculation. A useful check on their multiplicities is

Str⁡M2=tr⁡B++tr⁡B−−2tr⁡A=0,Str⁡M4=tr⁡B+2+tr⁡B−2−2tr⁡A2=2h2f2.\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Str}M^2 &=\operatorname{tr}B_++\operatorname{tr}B_- -2\operatorname{tr}A=0,\\ \operatorname{Str}M^4 &=\operatorname{tr}B_+^2+\operatorname{tr}B_-^2-2\operatorname{tr}A^2 =2h^2f^2. \end{aligned}

Here the supertrace weights each real scalar by +1+1 and each Weyl fermion by −2-2. The second result is independent of xx. It will ensure that the scale-dependent subtraction in the one-loop potential does not affect the curvature along XX.

Extract a finite curvature from the Gaussian integrals

Section titled “Extract a finite curvature from the Gaussian integrals”

For a real scalar, Gaussian integration contributes +12Tr⁡log⁡+\tfrac12\operatorname{Tr}\log of its kinetic operator. The fermion integral supplies the opposite sign with the spin multiplicity just counted. After rotating loop momentum to Euclidean signature, the heavy fields give

V1(x)=12∫d4p(2π)4[log⁡det⁡(p2I+B+)+log⁡det⁡(p2I+B−)−2log⁡det⁡(p2I+A)].V_1(x)=\frac12\int\frac{d^4p}{(2\pi)^4} \left[ \log\det(p^2I+B_+)+\log\det(p^2I+B_-) -2\log\det(p^2I+A) \right].

Dimensionful determinants in this expression are divided by a common reference scale to make their logarithms dimensionless; background-independent constants are suppressed. The full integral needs regulation and subtraction. The x2x^2 coefficient below is finite. The tree-level massless X,ψXX,\psi_X modes contribute only background-independent Gaussian determinants and do not enter it.

Write Δ=hf\Delta=hf for the mass-squared splitting and u=p2+m2u=p^2+m^2. Directly taking the two-by-two determinants gives

det⁡(p2I+B±)=u(u±Δ)+h2x2p2,det⁡(p2I+A)=u2+h2x2p2.\det(p^2I+B_\pm)=u(u\pm\Delta)+h^2x^2p^2,\qquad \det(p^2I+A)=u^2+h^2x^2p^2.

Expand each logarithm to first order in x2x^2. The coefficient in V1(x)=V1(0)+mX2x2+O(x4)V_1(x)=V_1(0)+m_X^2x^2+O(x^4) is

mX2=h22∫d4p(2π)4p2[1u(u+Δ)+1u(u−Δ)−2u2].m_X^2= \frac{h^2}{2}\int\frac{d^4p}{(2\pi)^4}p^2 \left[\frac1{u(u+\Delta)}+\frac1{u(u-\Delta)}-\frac2{u^2}\right].

Combining the terms before integrating exhibits the cancellation:

1u(u+Δ)+1u(u−Δ)−2u2=2Δ2u2(u2−Δ2).\frac1{u(u+\Delta)}+\frac1{u(u-\Delta)}-\frac2{u^2} =\frac{2\Delta^2}{u^2(u^2-\Delta^2)}.

The four-dimensional radial measure is d4p/(2π)4=t dt/(16π2)d^4p/(2\pi)^4=t\,dt/(16\pi^2) after angular integration, where t=p2t=p^2. Therefore

mX2=h2Δ216π2∫0∞t2 dt(t+m2)2[(t+m2)2−Δ2].\boxed{ m_X^2=\frac{h^2\Delta^2}{16\pi^2} \int_0^\infty \frac{t^2\,dt}{(t+m^2)^2[(t+m^2)^2-\Delta^2]}. }

At infinity the integrand falls as 1/t21/t^2; at zero it is regular when r<1r<1. Every factor in the denominator is positive. Thus the quantum curvature is positive without any numerical fit or appeal to a plot.

To evaluate it, set t=m2(z−1)t=m^2(z-1). The dimensionless integral starts at z=1z=1. One explicit primitive is

∫(z−1)2 dzz2(z2−r2)=1+r22r3log⁡z−rz+r+1r2z+1r2log⁡z2z2−r2.\begin{aligned} \int\frac{(z-1)^2\,dz}{z^2(z^2-r^2)} ={}&\frac{1+r^2}{2r^3}\log\frac{z-r}{z+r} +\frac1{r^2z}\\ &+\frac1{r^2}\log\frac{z^2}{z^2-r^2}. \end{aligned}

It tends to zero as z→∞z\to\infty. Subtracting its value at z=1z=1 yields

mX2=h2m2r232π2 ν(r),ν(r)=(1+r)2log⁡(1+r)−(1−r)2log⁡(1−r)−2rr3.m_X^2=\frac{h^2m^2r^2}{32\pi^2}\,\nu(r),\qquad \nu(r)= \frac{(1+r)^2\log(1+r)-(1-r)^2\log(1-r)-2r}{r^3}.

This agrees with Intriligator–Seiberg, (2.62), with their yy equal to our rr. Near the origin of the valley,

Veff(X)=V0+mX2∣X∣2+O(∣X∣4).V_{\rm eff}(X)=V_0+m_X^2|X|^2+O(|X|^4).

Since X=(XR+iXI)/2X=(X_R+iX_I)/\sqrt2, both real components have mass squared mX2m_X^2, with no additional factor of two. The one-loop correction to their kinetic normalization changes this already one-loop mass only at higher loop order.

For small breaking, expand the integral’s denominator in Δ2/(t+m2)2\Delta^2/(t+m^2)^2. Its leading term uses

∫0∞t2 dt(t+m2)4=13m2.\int_0^\infty\frac{t^2\,dt}{(t+m^2)^4}=\frac1{3m^2}.

Consequently

ν(r)=23+r215+O(r4),mX2=h4f248π2m2 [1+O(r2)].\nu(r)=\frac23+\frac{r^2}{15}+O(r^4),\qquad m_X^2=\frac{h^4f^2}{48\pi^2m^2}\,[1+O(r^2)].

This limit vanishes when f→0f\to0 or when the interaction is removed. It also shows that the lifted scalar can be much lighter than the fields that generated its potential.

For example take a reference mass MM and m=Mm=M, h=0.3h=0.3, f=2M2/3f=2M^2/3. Then r=0.2r=0.2, the lightest heavy scalar has mass 0.8 M\sqrt{0.8}\,M, and

mX2≃7.62984×10−6M2,mX≃2.76222×10−3M.m_X^2\simeq7.62984\times10^{-6}M^2,\qquad m_X\simeq2.76222\times10^{-3}M.

The leading small-rr approximation underestimates this mass squared by about 0.403%0.403\%. The loop parameter h2/(16π2)h^2/(16\pi^2) is small.

As a separate check, diagonalize A,B±A,B_\pm and insert their eigenvalues into the subtracted Coleman–Weinberg expression

V1=164π2[∑four real scalarsF(Mb2)−2∑two Weyl fermionsF(Mf2)],F(s)=s2(log⁡sμren2−32).V_1=\frac1{64\pi^2} \left[ \sum_{\text{four real scalars}}\mathcal F(M_b^2) -2\sum_{\text{two Weyl fermions}}\mathcal F(M_f^2) \right], \quad \mathcal F(s)=s^2\left(\log\frac{s}{\mu_{\rm ren}^2}-\frac32\right).

Here μren\mu_{\rm ren} is the subtraction scale. Changing it, or omitting the displayed constant −3/2-3/2, shifts only an XX-independent term because Str⁡M4\operatorname{Str}M^4 is constant. Evaluating the full spectral expression and extracting its small-XX curvature agrees with the finite integral for r=0.2,0.5,0.8r=0.2,0.5,0.8. At ordinary finite step sizes, the curvature error decreases by approximately four when XX is halved, as the next X4X^4 term predicts. This checks the calculation; it does not establish higher-loop accuracy.

The resulting local minimum at X=0X=0 is controlled for weak hh, near ∣hX∣≪m|hX|\ll m, and with rr separated from the threshold where another scalar becomes light. The Goldstino remains massless while its scalar partner acquires a positive mass. Superpotential nonrenormalization is consistent with this result: kinetic and other full-superspace terms can change the scalar potential after auxiliary elimination. A truncated two-derivative Kähler calculation reproduces the small-rr answer; the determinant calculation retains the full one-loop dependence on rr.

The classical potential rise is a horizontal dashed line at zero. A blue parabola rises on both sides of X equals zero, showing the positive local one-loop curvature. The horizontal coordinate is hx over m, and each potential is measured from its own value at the origin.

Along the real slice X=xX=x with both transverse scalars fixed at zero, the classical valley is flat. The solid curve shows the local quadratic rise from the quantum potential’s value at X=0X=0; the dashed curve is measured from the classical potential’s own value there. The positive curvature gives the scalar a mass while the Goldstino remains massless. This illustrates the local approximation for the stated r=0.2r=0.2, weak-coupling example, rather than the full potential.

Our classical bound was global. The quantum calculation here establishes a local minimum and its curvature; it has not analyzed the effective potential at arbitrarily large XX or specified an ultraviolet completion. Nor does “nonsupersymmetric” automatically mean “metastable”: a decay claim requires a lower region and a barrier, and a lifetime requires additional work.

1. Locate the threshold and identify the missing light field

Section titled “1. Locate the threshold and identify the missing light field”

Keep f,h,m>0f,h,m>0 and examine X=ϕ2=0X=\phi_2=0, ϕ1=ib/2\phi_1=ib/\sqrt2 with real bb. Derive the potential along this line. What happens at r=1r=1 and at r>1r>1? Does the continued nonzero FXF_X at the origin make that point a stable broken vacuum?

Hint 1

Keep the quartic term when the quadratic coefficient vanishes.

Hint 2

The Goldstino argument is about a broken symmetry at a vacuum. A zero fermion mass at an unstable stationary configuration is not a stability proof.

Solution

On this line WX=f−hb2/4W_X=f-hb^2/4 and ∣W2∣2=m2b2/2|W_2|^2=m^2b^2/2, giving

V(b)=f2+12(m2−hf)b2+h216b4.V(b)=f^2+\frac12(m^2-hf)b^2+\frac{h^2}{16}b^4.

For r<1r<1 the origin has positive curvature along bb. At r=1r=1 the quadratic term vanishes, but the quartic is positive: this direction is not an exactly flat classical modulus. It is an additional massless fluctuation at quadratic order, so a low-energy theory that had integrated it out needs to be reconsidered.

For r>1r>1, arbitrarily small nonzero bb lowers the potential. The origin is a saddle, despite FX=−fF_X=-f and the massless ψX\psi_X there. The nonzero minima on this particular line occur at

b2=4(hf−m2)h2.b^2=\frac{4(hf-m^2)}{h^2}.

Finding these line minima alone does not classify the full new vacuum set. The strict stable regime used in the lesson cannot be extended by ignoring the negative eigenvalue or by analytically continuing a determinant through it.

2. Show positivity without a numerical approximation

Section titled “2. Show positivity without a numerical approximation”

Let N(r)=(1+r)2log⁡(1+r)−(1−r)2log⁡(1−r)−2rN(r)=(1+r)^2\log(1+r)-(1-r)^2\log(1-r)-2r. Use N′′′(r)N'''(r) to obtain a positive power series for ν(r)=N(r)/r3\nu(r)=N(r)/r^3 on 0<r<10<r<1. Recover the first two terms and explain why the result gives the mass of both real components of XX.

Hint 1

N(0)=N′(0)=N′′(0)=0N(0)=N'(0)=N''(0)=0. Expand 1/(1−r2)1/(1-r^2) and integrate three times.

Hint 2

The potential contains mX2∣X∣2m_X^2|X|^2, while the real-field kinetic terms each carry 1/21/2.

Solution

Differentiation gives N′′′(r)=4/(1−r2)N'''(r)=4/(1-r^2). The three vanishing initial values fix all integration constants. Termwise integration of the convergent geometric series gives

N(r)=∑n=0∞4r2n+3(2n+1)(2n+2)(2n+3).N(r)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{4r^{2n+3}}{(2n+1)(2n+2)(2n+3)}.

Therefore

ν(r)=∑n=0∞4r2n(2n+1)(2n+2)(2n+3)=23+r215+2r4105+⋯ .\nu(r)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{4r^{2n}}{(2n+1)(2n+2)(2n+3)} =\frac23+\frac{r^2}{15}+\frac{2r^4}{105}+\cdots.

Every coefficient is positive. This supplies an analytic positivity check independent of evaluating the logarithms at sample points. Multiplying by h2m2r2/(32π2)h^2m^2r^2/(32\pi^2) gives the leading mass h4f2/(48π2m2)h^4f^2/(48\pi^2m^2).

Finally ∣X∣2=(XR2+XI2)/2|X|^2=(X_R^2+X_I^2)/2 and ∣∂X∣2=[(∂XR)2+(∂XI)2]/2|\partial X|^2=[(\partial X_R)^2+(\partial X_I)^2]/2. The same coefficient mX2m_X^2 is therefore the mass squared of each canonically normalized real component. Neither real scalar is required to remain degenerate with the Goldstino in this broken vacuum.

3. A small interaction can create distant supersymmetric vacua

Section titled “3. A small interaction can create distant supersymmetric vacua”

Modify the superpotential by ΔW=εmϕ22/2\Delta W=\varepsilon m\phi_2^2/2, with fixed real ε≠0\varepsilon\ne0. Solve all F equations. Where do the solutions go as ε→0\varepsilon\to0? Does the existence of those solutions, together with our undeformed one-loop mass, calculate a metastable lifetime?

Hint 1

The equation for ϕ2\phi_2 first gives ϕ2=−ϕ1/ε\phi_2=-\phi_1/\varepsilon. The XX equation ensures ϕ1≠0\phi_1\ne0.

Hint 2

A fixed superpotential coefficient can break R symmetry while preserving supersymmetry of the action. The new theory requires its own local stability calculation.

Solution

The equations are

f+h2ϕ12=0,hXϕ1+mϕ2=0,mϕ1+εmϕ2=0.f+\frac h2\phi_1^2=0,\qquad hX\phi_1+m\phi_2=0,\qquad m\phi_1+\varepsilon m\phi_2=0.

The first gives ϕ1=±i2f/h\phi_1=\pm i\sqrt{2f/h}. The other two then imply

X=mhε,ϕ2=−ϕ1ε.X=\frac{m}{h\varepsilon},\qquad \phi_2=-\frac{\phi_1}{\varepsilon}.

All three auxiliaries vanish, so both solutions have zero energy with canonical kinetic terms. This agrees with Intriligator–Seiberg, §2.6, (2.36)–(2.39). As ε→0\varepsilon\to0, XX and ϕ2\phi_2 escape to infinity; no finite supersymmetric solution of the original model is recovered.

The deformation preserves supersymmetry of the action. With ε\varepsilon fixed and neutral, its operator has R-charge four instead of the required two, so it explicitly breaks the selected R symmetry.

The lower-energy supersymmetric solutions change the global question, but the undeformed curvature is not the effective potential of the new theory. To establish a nearby metastable state, recompute its stationary point and transverse stability with the deformation included. To calculate its lifetime, determine the barrier and a tunneling solution in a controlled regime. The F roots alone provide neither calculation.

The model now separates three statements that are easy to conflate: incompatible F equations exclude a supersymmetric configuration, the classical bound establishes stable minima, and the loop determinant lifts their scalar degeneracy. The Goldstino follows the broken global symmetry through that last step.