Observable normalizations
Before comparing two numbers, identify what was held fixed: the operator, its source, the gauge group, the integration measure and the background. A factor of two in a current coefficient can be a notation change. Replacing an ordinary trace by a normalized trace inside the action can change the coupling. This reference makes those distinctions explicit; the linked lessons supply the complete derivations.
For Euclidean sources collectively denoted by , use
The complex logarithm uses a continuous local branch where . A normalized expectation value includes division by the same . A sphere partition function is not, merely by being called a partition function, a thermal trace or an integer count.
Five different counting and generating objects
Section titled “Five different counting and generating objects”Here denotes fermion parity. It is distinct from a flavor charge and from the free energy .
| Object | Definition and essential data | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| Witten index in quantum mechanics | , with , a specified Hilbert space and operator domains | A signed count of zero-energy states when the heat traces and pairing argument are valid |
| Three-dimensional superconformal index | A graded trace on the physical Hilbert space on , using a chosen conformal supercharge and charges commuting with it | A weighted signed count of its cohomology, including states of nonzero conformal dimension |
| Hilbert series | for a specified nonnegatively graded ring with finite-dimensional graded pieces | Dimensions of graded ring components; no fermion-parity sign is inserted in this definition |
| Sphere partition function | The path integral on a specified supersymmetric sphere background, with a fixed contour, source prescription and counterterms | A generating function for integrated responses and normalized insertions |
| Topologically twisted index | A supersymmetric trace with the spatial R-symmetry flux and circle spin/R-holonomy specified; flavor fluxes and fugacities are additional data | A signed count in the twisted background, which differs from the radial superconformal background |
For the site’s Witten index, the upper component is bosonic. Its positive-frequency supersymmetric oscillator has . Tong assigns the opposite parity to the upper component, so that example has the opposite sign in his convention. Also, does not imply that there are no supersymmetric states: one even and one odd zero-energy state cancel. Noncompact continuous spectra require additional care; subtracting two divergent traces is not the definition above. Tong, section 1.2.2
The three-dimensional radial index uses the dimensionless conformal generator , the physical superconformal charge and a sphere rotation . Choose with charges . Then
The flavor charges commute with and ; alone does not. The trace includes the gauge projection and required dynamical magnetic sectors. Background flavor fluxes, if present, are fixed separately. The regulator has here; the parameter in IDX3 (2.1) is . Convergence of the fugacity expansion is part of the prescription.
By contrast, the simplest twisted trace uses R-flux , periodic circle spin structure, and the corresponding trivial circle R-holonomy. With no rotational fugacity its cohomology trace has the insertion . Changing the spin/R-holonomy choice changes that insertion; changing the R-charge lattice changes which fields are globally defined. The same manifold name therefore does not identify this trace with (RF10.2). CK19 (6.1)–(6.5)
A Hilbert series is a third operation. For example, with , has because are independent and is nilpotent. Its reduced ring is , with series , although both have the same single vacuum point. Neither series determines the Witten index without a Hilbert space, parity and supercharge. See chiral rings and vacuum points.
Current coefficients: an actual factor-of-two translation
Section titled “Current coefficients: an actual factor-of-two translation”At separated points in a three-dimensional conformal theory, define and write . Two sources attach a coefficient called to different prefactors:
The left convention is P (8.3); the right is CT (2.2), with its separate contact term omitted here. For the same normalized current, equality requires . Direct differentiation gives
For the physical R-current of a free three-dimensional chiral multiplet, whose scalar has R-charge , , so and . This is a translation of notation, not a rescaling of .
The current-correlator lesson fixes the accompanying stress-tensor convention. In that convention for the superconformal R-current. The specified squashing family gives
This uses the full P background, the physical R-current and the stated supersymmetric conformal subtraction. It is not a formula for an arbitrary metric-only deformation or a trial R-current. The free chiral check is . A change of the parameter also changes the numerical Hessian by the chain rule.
Three benchmark conventions
Section titled “Three benchmark conventions”The normalized four-dimensional circular loop
Section titled “The normalized four-dimensional circular loop”For the fundamental half-BPS circle in super Yang–Mills, set and , where is the sphere radius and the constant Hermitian localization scalar. The finite- matrix expectation is
is the ordinary fundamental trace. The first integral is over all Hermitian matrices; the answer instead integrates traceless matrices, at the same and . This includes the scalar coupling of the half-BPS loop, not just gauge holonomy. It is an exact finite- formula for this observable, not a planar approximation. The finite- lesson connects the original proposal to localization and derives the center factor. The trace distinction appears explicitly in DG (5.1).
First-paper Seiberg–Witten periods
Section titled “First-paper Seiberg–Witten periods”For four-dimensional pure theory, this site uses the first paper’s electric and magnetic special coordinates :
The W boson has and the smooth basic monopole has . A fundamental Wilson probe has electric label ; it is not dynamical matter in the pure theory. The coordinates have mass dimension one. The bound is saturated by an existing BPS state; it does not assert the existence or stability of every charge pair. These are exact two-derivative low-energy data, and in general . The charge and period dictionary explains the conversion to the algebraic central charge . SW1 (4.3)–(4.6)
ABJM canonical normalization
Section titled “ABJM canonical normalization”Use compact with no additional quotient, positive integer , and the massless round-sphere prescription of the small-rank calculation: , , with no flavor masses or Fayet–Iliopoulos sources. The Cartan measure includes , and the dimensionless variables have phase . The exact normalization obeys
In the exact Fermi-gas formulation, ; the positive operator is not normalized to unit trace. Its Fredholm determinant generates the canonical coefficients . That auxiliary particle-number generating function is not a supersymmetric index. Large- phase-volume and Airy approximations retain this measure convention but are not substitutes for the exact finite- coefficients. FG (3.3), (3.7), (3.9), (3.24)
What source and scheme changes do
Section titled “What source and scheme changes do”For any one source parameter , differentiating (RF10.1) gives
The explicit second derivative includes quadratic source couplings, often called seagulls. Thus an integrated response is not obtained by integrating only the separated two-point function. The source-response lesson also fixes the supersymmetric path through auxiliary sources when a mass is varied.
A source-only local term multiplies by and shifts by . It cancels between numerator and denominator of a fixed normalized insertion. A separate finite counterterm on the line can still redefine a Wilson-loop observable. Specify that defect prescription too.
For a compact, unit-charge flavor source on a spin three-manifold, an allowed integer Chern–Simons counterterm shifts the contact coefficient by an integer; this is not an arbitrary continuous change of the separated coefficient . The charge lattice and spin assumption matter. CT (1.3)–(1.7)
In four-dimensional superconformal theories a different ambiguity occurs. For the renormalized supersymmetric sphere partition function, locally on the space of exactly marginal couplings ,
Here is a Kähler potential on coupling space, not on the Seiberg–Witten vacuum space. The metric is unchanged by this local holomorphic ambiguity. Its operator normalization uses the source term and . See GI (1.1)–(2.3) and universal observables.
Three quick convention tests
Section titled “Three quick convention tests”1. Replace the trace in the Gaussian action
Section titled “1. Replace the trace in the Gaussian action”Define . Someone replaces by in the action of (RF10.6), retaining , and uses the correctly normalized insertion . Has division by repaired the change? Find the coupling actually being evaluated.
Solution
The new action is , whereas the intended action is . It therefore evaluates with . A normalized ratio cancels a constant measure factor, not a change in the distribution. To keep the same theory, use . As a check, the Gaussian contraction gives ; the mistaken action gives .
2. Double the current
Section titled “2. Double the current”Replace the physical R-current by and choose its source so that . What happens to and to the coefficient called ? Can the new coefficient be inserted unchanged into the stress-tensor relation?
Solution
, while . Hence and, if the prefactor in (RF10.3) is retained, . This is different from the factor-two source-notation translation in (RF10.3). The physical stress tensor has not changed. The relation assumes R-charge normalization in which the supercharges have unit magnitude; does not obey that normalization. For compact sources, the connection periods and charge lattice must also be translated, not silently held fixed while dividing by two.
3. Continue a mass away from the real axis
Section titled “3. Continue a mass away from the real axis”On the round sphere with , , take a constant flavor scalar , auxiliary field , vanishing flavor connection, and . An integer level- supersymmetric flavor counterterm gives . Determine its effect on for real , and then for with real. Does equality of absolute values at real mass establish equality of complex partition functions?
Solution
The bosonic term in P (6.28) is . Multiplication by the sphere volume gives , confirming the phase in the question. For real its modulus is one, so although locally. For complex , and . Real-mass absolute values therefore miss the phase and do not determine the analytically continued absolute values. The statement compares two declared integer-counterterm prescriptions; it does not license arbitrary changes to the global flavor-source normalization.