Spinors in three dimensions
Before this lesson: Grassmann variables and their calculus.
The expression contracts a spinor parameter with a spinor field. To calculate with it, we need to know exactly what moving the index does. An unnoticed sign at this stage will later look like a failed supersymmetry transformation.
We will build the conventions from two-by-two matrices, check their products, and derive a useful identity that replaces a product of two spinors by a scalar and a vector. The preparation is Grassmann calculus and ordinary matrix multiplication. All calculations here take place in flat three-dimensional Euclidean space, with metric , coordinates labeled , and orientation . No gauge field, curved background, or particular action is involved.
These spinor conventions are the ones used in Appendix A.1 of Supersymmetric Field Theories on Three-Manifolds, v3. Choosing them is a choice of notation and signature, not a claim that a given background preserves supersymmetry.
A spinor is a two-component rotation representation
Section titled “A spinor is a two-component rotation representation”A Euclidean three-dimensional spinor is a column
on which acts. Here means the two-by-two unitary matrices of determinant one. It is the double cover of the ordinary rotation group: two matrices, and , produce the same rotation of vectors.
For example, a spinor rotation through angle around the first axis is represented in our basis by
At , this is , while at it is . A bilinear made from two spinors returns to itself after because the two minus signs multiply to plus.
The components may be ordinary commuting complex numbers, as for a spinor labeling a supersymmetry generator, or Grassmann-odd quantities, as for a fermion field. Their rotation law is the same. Their exchange signs differ.
Multiply the gamma matrices first
Section titled “Multiply the gamma matrices first”The gamma matrices connect vector directions with operators on spinors. With row index and column index , fix
Equivalently, these are in terms of the Pauli matrices. They act on lower-index columns: .
Each matrix squares to . For two different directions, explicitly,
The other cyclic products work the same way. Together these calculations give
Adding this formula to the one with interchanged yields the Clifford algebra,
The antisymmetric part fixes the orientation-sensitive sign:
Checking only the anticommutator would miss an error in that last sign. These matrices and product identities agree with equations (A.3)–(A.4) of the source paper.
For a real vector , define . Its square is
The second term vanishes because a symmetric product is contracted with an antisymmetric tensor. This gives a useful check with a physical interpretation: the matrix associated with a unit direction has eigenvalues and .
Raising an index is an antisymmetric contraction
Section titled “Raising an index is an antisymmetric contraction”Use spinor indices , and define
Thus . The two matrices are inverses. They act on the left:
In components,
Lowering again recovers and . No complex conjugation has taken place.
The scalar contraction is defined by
If denotes the lower-index epsilon matrix, the same expression is , where is transpose without conjugation. The identity for makes this contraction invariant under simultaneous spinor rotations.
For commuting columns and , one finds
The sign comes from the antisymmetric contraction, even though the entries themselves commute.
The Hermitian adjoint is a different operation. In the source convention,
where the bar complex conjugates the component. For , epsilon raising gives components , whereas the adjoint has upper-index components . For commuting columns, . For Grassmann-valued fields, adjunction reverses product order, and a formal even bilinear is not a positive real number to which a numerical inequality can automatically be applied.
Scalar and vector bilinears have different exchange signs
Section titled “Scalar and vector bilinears have different exchange signs”Define the vector bilinear by
Its three components follow by multiplication:
Unlike the scalar contraction, the coefficient matrices are symmetric. If the spinors have definite parities , exchanging their entries therefore gives
There are two potential signs: one from the contraction matrix and one from moving odd components past each other. For two odd spinors, the scalar bilinear is symmetric under exchanging the spinors, while the vector bilinear is antisymmetric. For two commuting spinors, those statements are reversed. With one commuting and one odd spinor, no Grassmann exchange sign appears.
In particular, a commuting spinor satisfies , but its vector bilinear need not vanish. An odd spinor instead satisfies
These are statements about the parity of the components, not different choices of gamma matrices.
Derive the two-spinor rearrangement
Section titled “Derive the two-spinor rearrangement”A two-by-two matrix has four independent entries. The four matrices form a basis: they obey
Write . Taking a trace fixes , while multiplying by and tracing fixes . Thus
This formula also works with Grassmann-valued entries: the basis matrices have ordinary numerical entries, so no odd factors have been exchanged.
Now choose an outer product
Keep the order of coefficients then throughout. Using the component rules above gives
Substitute these coefficients into the matrix expansion:
This is a Fierz identity: a rearrangement following from completeness of the spinor matrices. It is valid for commuting or odd with the displayed ordering. Any subsequent exchange of spinors must still use their parities.
For an immediate check, let , . The left side is , while and . The right side is therefore , the same matrix.
Acting on a third spinor gives a particularly useful version,
No reordering was needed here. This identity turns products of spinor parameters and fermion fields into the scalar and vector structures needed when composing supersymmetry transformations.
To compare directly with the source’s all-lower-index equation, lower the second gamma index by
The resulting symmetric matrices are . The same completeness relation gives
This is the second identity in the source’s equation (A.4). As a component check, set and : both sides give . The coefficient arrays for this lowered gamma matrix and for the bilinear occupy different index positions; do not replace one by the other without doing the contractions.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”1. Invert a vector matrix
Section titled “1. Invert a vector matrix”For a nonzero real vector , use the Clifford algebra to find . Check it explicitly for , and state what happens as .
First hint
The lesson already computed .
Second hint
For the specified vector, .
Complete solution
Since for a nonzero real Euclidean vector,
For , multiplication gives
so division by five gives the inverse. At , the matrix is zero and has no inverse. If has units of momentum, the inverse has inverse-momentum units, as required. The restriction to real Euclidean vectors matters: a nonzero complex vector can have .
2. Change the statistics, not the matrices
Section titled “2. Change the statistics, not the matrices”Let have commuting entries. Let have independent odd entries. Calculate , , , and . Explain why need not vanish although each component squares to zero.
First hint
Use before applying exchange rules.
Second hint
The product is nonzero, and .
Complete solution
The results are
The self-contraction of uses two different generators, so nilpotency of each generator does not set their product to zero. Its square does vanish, providing another check. The mixed exchange has no extra Grassmann sign because commute.
3. Catch an orientation error
Section titled “3. Catch an orientation error”Replace only by , leaving and unchanged. Does the Clifford algebra still hold? Do the orientation-sensitive product formula and triple-product check still agree with the original convention?
First hint
Squaring a matrix is insensitive to its overall sign.
Second hint
The product has not changed, but the matrix on the right side of has.
Complete solution
The Clifford algebra still holds: the new matrix squares to and anticommutes with the other two. However,
The original oriented product formula therefore fails with the stipulated . This alternative matrix basis would require translating the orientation-dependent convention consistently. Passing the Clifford check alone is insufficient to justify copying formulas involving .
From Euclidean spinors to supersymmetry
Section titled “From Euclidean spinors to supersymmetry”Two complex components specify the spinor representation used here; they do not by themselves specify the number of supercharges in a theory. Three-dimensional has four real Lorentzian Poincaré supercharges, as explained at the start of section 2 of Aharony and collaborators. A field, an odd symmetry generator, and a commuting spinor used to label that generator can all carry the same spinor index.
The next step is Euclidean continuation and independent spinors. It explains how Lorentzian conjugate fields are treated after continuation and why a Euclidean tilde label is not automatically a dagger. Before moving on, take two spinors of specified parity and explain which of three operations you are performing: raising an index, conjugating a component, or exchanging the spinors. Each has its own rule.
For a further algebraic application, Fierz identities from explicit matrices rearranges four-spinor products, checks a fermion interaction and constructs the unit direction associated with a commuting spinor.
The gamma-matrix and bilinear laboratory provides a runnable exact calculation of these identities with genuine Grassmann entries. Change the orientation or the entry statistics and compare the predicted diagnostic with the output.
Paper guides
Connect this lesson to the original papers and their notation.
First calculation on a curved space
Reconstruct the three-manifold paper
Four-dimensional appendices
Learn ABJM and its first sphere partition function
Vacua and enhanced supersymmetry
Fermi gas and fixed-k large N
Enter research after one completed capstone
Enter research after the ABJM rank-one integral
Enter research after SQED-XYZ deformations
3d SQED and infrared duality
Sphere duality benchmark
Protected-index comparison
A first field-theory index